We did extensive testing of 2.1 (Alexey, Artyom, Irina, Vasya, Yuliya) additional causes are: 1) there were no issues reported by users 2) We better release 2.1.1 or 2.2 in a month than wait another 6 months
ps Apach Wicket has 1 month release cycle .... I believe we should have 2-3 month On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:20 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > I was wondering if the testing phase that I thought we have agreed on > already happen? > Or is there another reason why you initiated this RC? > > Sebastian > > > 2013/3/23 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > > > Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 > RC3 > > > > RC2 was rejected due to broken audio/video setup panel > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/README > > > > Full Changelog: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG > > > > Release artefacts: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/ > > > > Tag:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/ > > > > PGP release keys (signed using C467526E): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/KEYS > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > My vote is +1. > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > http://www.webbase-design.de > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > seba.wag...@gmail.com > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
