Hi Maxim, could you plz check if our binaries and sources are correctly organized? I am currently not sure, the other projects seem to have the structure:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/binaries/ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/sources/ while we do create a binary and source folder for each version. I know this might be picky but its our first release and it is likely that the conventions we make now will stay like that forever. So are we going to create a separate folder for each release? So https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.1/bin https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.2/bin https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/2.3/bin Is that in line with the ASF docs ? The other projects seem to cut the 0 in the name of the release. We have it now with the folder name 2.1 and the package itself is called 2.1.0. Please decide for either one :) Either you call the folder (if there is one for each release) 2.1.0 and the package 2.1.0 or call the folder 2.1 and the package has the name 2.1 :) Thanks, Sebastian -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
