done, minor INFRA tasks remains :) On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:57 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > 2015-12-13 18:47 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: > > > I see no objections > > so I'll perform the change :) > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > recently one of the Apache members point me to inconsistencies in our > > SVN > > > tree structure. > > > Usually component have 'plain' structure > > > > > > Module > > > -- trunk > > > -- branches > > > -- tags > > > > > > we have structure like this: > > > > > > OM > > > --trunk > > > -- debian/ > > > -- debian_package/ > > > -- patches/ > > > -- plugins/ > > > -- singlewebapp/ > > > -- site/ > > > -- branches (of singlewebapp) > > > -- tags (of singlewebapp) > > > > > > I propose following structure: > > > OM > > > -- application > > > -- trunk > > > -- branches > > > -- tags > > > -- debian > > > -- trunk (with contents of *debian_package*, *debian* should be > > > removed as it is GPL licensed) > > > -- plugin > > > -- trunk (plugins from trunk and branches should be moved here) > > > -- site > > > -- trunk (with contents of trunk/site) > > > -- branches (with 3.0.x and 2.x docs) > > > > > > Additionally I would like to ask INFRA to create RW mirror of OM (or at > > > least OM/application) at git > > > > > > please let me know in case you are against such restructuring or would > > > like to propose different structure > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > -- > > > WBR > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > seba.wag...@gmail.com > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
