Hi Wiliam,

thanks for pointing out they should work! To test, I lazily switched my code to 
opennlp-tools 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT assuming that the latest snapshot is equivalent to 
the release candidate. With the SNAPSHOT, all my test cases fails with messages 
like

> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 
> opennlp.tools.util.InvalidFormatException: Model version 1.5.0 is not 
> supported by this (1.6.0-SNAPSHOT) version of OpenNLP!
> 
> Caused by: opennlp.tools.util.InvalidFormatException: Model version 1.5.3 is 
> not supported by this (1.6.0-SNAPSHOT) version of OpenNLP!

Now I switched to the release candidate repository and with the actual release 
candidate the tests work fine. Maybe the version-checking code is unable to 
handle the "-SNAPSHOT" suffix in the version.

Nice :)

-- Richard

On 23.01.2015, at 00:25, William Colen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually they should be. Did you find an issue?
> 
> 
> 2015-01-22 21:20 GMT-02:00 Richard Eckart de Castilho <
> [email protected]>:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> it is a pity that apparently apparently no existing models (1.5.0 up to
>> 1.5.3) are supported anymore with version 1.6.0.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- Richard
>> 
>> 
>> On 22.01.2015, at 20:55, William Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Our second release candidate is ready for testing. RC 1 failed to pass
>> the
>>> initial tests.
>>> 
>>> The RC 2 can be downloaded from here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~colen/releases/opennlp-1.6.0/rc2/
>>> 
>>> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or
>>> opennlp-uima to 1.6.0 and add the following URL to your settings.xml
>> file:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1001
>>> 
>>> The current test plan can be found here:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/TestPlan1.6.0
>>> 
>>> Please sign up for tasks in the test plan.
>>> 
>>> The release plan can be found here:
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/ReleasePlanAndTasks1.6.0
>>> 
>>> The RC contains quite some changes, please refer to the contained issue
>>> list for details.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> William

Reply via email to