Hello, I tested the pos tagger, namefinder and constituent parser in my projects and no problems reported.
I am not aware of any issues left for next RC. Cheers, R On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I accidentally didn't include the dev list in my reply. > > Here are my two replies: > > Ok, that is great, then we don't need to do anything. > > I found a bug in the brat parser and fixed it already OPENNLP-784. Would > be nice to get it in the release. > Looks like we have to make one more RC to fix the notice and license > file for the binary distribution. > There was also a fix for the README. The test plan has some details > about that. > > And just today I discovered a bug in the Name Finder, looks like it > ignores the custom factory. We should get that > fixed too before the next RC. I am currently trying to train a name > finder with a custom factory for one of my work projects > and in the process of doing that I started to debug that particular > issue. > I will open a jira issue for it. > > Anyone else please download RC 4 and give it a try with your projects. > We are happy about every bug we can avoid shipping. > > > And the second one: > The name finder bug is now fixed. > > Should we go ahead and make the next RC? > Are there any outstanding issues left which would prevent us from > releasing it? > I am not aware of any. > > Jörn > > > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 07:56 -0300, William Colen wrote: >> Yes, the sentence detector does not match, but it is such a small >> change that I would not even investigate. >> It is an empty line that used to be included in the 1.5.3 output, but >> it is not included in 1.6.0 anymore: >> >> >> >> Output in 1.5.3: >> Imagem inline 1 >> >> >> >> Output in 1.6.0: >> Imagem inline 3 >> >> >> >> >> >> I would ignore the change. >> >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> William >> >> >> >> 2015-05-28 7:28 GMT-03:00 Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com>: >> The chunker and parser tests are fine now. >> >> Do you know what's the deal with the sentence detector? >> >> The compatibility test is marked as failed. Can we leave it >> like that or do we have to fix some bugs? >> >> Jörn >> >> On May 23, 2015 5:35 AM, "William Colen" <co...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> Our fourth release candidate is ready for testing. RC >> 3 failed in the >> compatibility, regression and performance tests, which >> are fixed in RC 4. >> >> The RC 4 can be downloaded from here: >> http://people.apache.org/~colen/releases/opennlp-1.6.0/rc4/ >> >> To use it in a maven build set the version for >> opennlp-tools or >> opennlp-uima to 1.6.0 and add the following URL to >> your settings.xml file: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1003 >> >> The current test plan can be found here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/TestPlan1.6.0 >> >> Please sign up for tasks in the test plan. >> >> The release plan can be found here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/ReleasePlanAndTasks1.6.0 >> >> The release contains quite some changes, please refer >> to the contained >> issue list for details. >> >> For your convenience, a copy of the issue list, as >> well as the release >> notes and the readme, can be found in the following >> link: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~colen/releases/opennlp-1.6.0/rc4/RELEASE_NOTES.html >> >> >> Thank you, >> William >> >> >
