Hello,

Thanks. I thought I had an idea for CRF not obtaining good results
with OpenNLP default features, e.g.,

http://lingpipe-blog.com/2006/11/22/why-do-you-hate-crfs/

but if results are also worse in Maxent, that is intriguing. I will
look at the Mallet implementation to see if I find out something.

R



On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> fixed up the code a bit. The performance is not really good. Do you have
> any idea why that could be?
>
> Neither the maxent or crf get good evaluation numbers on NER.
>
> I will push the changes and then you can experiment with it too.
>
> Jörn
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Rodrigo Agerri <rage...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Joern Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > We can also move
>> > it to the sandbox, releasing it at Apache might be more difficult since
>> > mallet pulls in incompatible licensed dependencies. But maybe that
>> changed,
>> > we can check.
>>
>> Mallet is released under Common Public License
>>
>> http://opensource.org/licenses/cpl1.0.php
>>
>> but as you have mentioned, it pulls several dependencies that are
>> LGPL. These are the dependencies:
>>
>>   <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.beanshell</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>bsh</artifactId>
>>       <version>2.0b4</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> This version is LGPL, however, later versions are APL 2.0
>>
>> https://github.com/beanshell/beanshell
>>
>> <dependency>
>>       <groupId>jgrapht</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>jgrapht</artifactId>
>>       <version>0.6.0</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> that version was also LGPL, but it has now been dual-licensed with EPL 1.0
>>
>> https://github.com/jgrapht/jgrapht/wiki/Relicensing
>>
>> which could be included also in APL 2.0 projects
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>
>>  <dependency>
>>       <groupId>net.sf.jwordnet</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>jwnl</artifactId>
>>       <version>1.4_rc3</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> BSD license, but this library has already been discussed here.
>>
>>  <dependency>
>>       <groupId>net.sf.trove4j</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>trove4j</artifactId>
>>       <version>2.0.2</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> LGPL-ed.
>>
>> <dependency>
>>       <groupId>com.googlecode.matrix-toolkits-java</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>mtj</artifactId>
>>       <version>0.9.14</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> also LGPL
>>
>> Rodrigo
>>

Reply via email to