Ok thank you so much guys!

2016-08-12 16:43 GMT+02:00 William Colen <william.co...@gmail.com>:

> You need to train with a corpus that is as close as possible as your
> runtime corpus. If your runtime corpus is like that I think it is ok.
> Otherwise, the model can learn that an entity is too often. Like, there is
> an entity in the middle of every window.
>
>
> 2016-08-12 11:35 GMT-03:00 Damiano Porta <damianopo...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ok, but why not just ignore all the others tokens? i mean... when i
> write 2
> > TOKENS + ENTITY + 2 TOKENS i am interested on finding the entity with
> this
> > surrounding tokens so it should mean that other "cases" can be ignored.
> No?
> >
> > Why do i need to write all the other cases when those must be ignored.
> >
> > 2016-08-12 16:26 GMT+02:00 William Colen <william.co...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > You also need examples of what is not entities.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2016-08-12 11:21 GMT-03:00 Damiano Porta <damianopo...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > pardon for the stupid question but i really do not get the point
> about
> > > > training a maxent model with complete sentences.
> > > >
> > > > For example:
> > > >
> > > > <START:person> Pierre Vinken <END> , 61 years old , will join the
> board
> > > as
> > > > a nonexecutive director Nov. 29 .
> > > >
> > > > it has ~20 tokens.
> > > > As described here:
> > > > https://opennlp.apache.org/documentation/1.6.0/manual/
> > > > opennlp.html#tools.namefind.training.featuregen
> > > > the default window should be 2 tokens on the left and 2 tokens on the
> > > right
> > > > of the entity. So, what's the point of writing the entire sentence if
> > > there
> > > > are no other entities ?
> > > >
> > > > As far i have understood it correctly, it should take into account
> the
> > > > Pierre Vinken (as entity name) and "," "61" as the next 2 tokens. So,
> > why
> > > > do we need "*years old , will join the board as a nonexecutive*" ?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you in advance for the clarification!
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Damiano
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to