+1 binding Eval tests pass Looks good
On Dec 22, 2017 10:04 AM, "William Colen" <william.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 binding > > Executed eval-tests suite. > > -- > William > > 2017-12-22 6:05 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Agerri <rodrigo.age...@ehu.eus>: > > > +1 binding > > > > R > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Koji Sekiguchi > > <koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > I checked files included in the -src package, built successfully, etc. > > > > > > Koji > > > > > > > > > On 2017/12/21 23:44, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Folks, > > >> > > >> I have posted a first release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4 > > >> release and it is ready for testing. > > >> > > >> The RC1 distributables can be downloaded from here: > > >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapacheopennlp-1020/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.8.4 > > >> > > >> The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4 tag at > > >> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.8.4 > > >> > > >> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or > > >> opennlp-uima to 1.8.4 and add the following URL to your settings.xml > > file: > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > orgapacheopennlp-1020 > > >> > > >> The release was made using the OpenNLP release process, documented on > > the > > >> Wiki here: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/Release+Process > > >> > > >> The release contains quite some changes, please refer to the contained > > >> issue list for details. > > >> > > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4. The > > vote > > >> is > > >> open for at least the next 72 hours. > > >> > > >> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to > check > > >> the > > >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > > passes > > >> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP <version> > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> Jeff Zemerick > > >> > > > > > >
