+1 Biding

Tried it with DKPro and other projects.

William Colen

Em seg., 23 de dez. de 2019 às 12:04, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
escreveu:

> +1 binding
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 9:28 AM Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > tag build succeeds (jdk 8), signatures ok.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 13:32, Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > verified signatures
> > > built and tested from opennlp-1.9.2 tag using openjdk 8
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 1.9.2
> > > release
> > > > and it is ready for testing.
> > > >
> > > > The distributables can be downloaded from:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1026/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.9.2/
> > > >
> > > > The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.9.2 tag at:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.9.2
> > > >
> > > > To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or
> > > > opennlp-uima to 1.9.2 and add the following URL to your settings.xml
> > > file:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1026
> > > >
> > > > The release was made using the OpenNLP release process, documented on
> > the
> > > > website:
> > > > https://opennlp.apache.org/release.html
> > > >
> > > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.9.2. The
> > vote
> > > > is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
> > check
> > > > the release candidate and vote.
> > > > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.9.2
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to