Thx for the responses. I am preparing a RC and will open a vote once the eval 
build has passed.

> Am 06.12.2025 um 10:33 schrieb Martin Wiesner <[email protected]>:
> 
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> 
>> Am 05.12.2025 um 14:51 schrieb Jeff Zemerick <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> I'm +1 to a release. Good catch on the vote. A list of checks would be very
>> helpful to myself and I'm sure new users, too.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 1:03 AM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I messed up the release artifacts for 2.5.6.1 and in October we voted only
>>> on the source release created by the release plugin in the top root
>>> directory instead of
>>> 
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   7.4M Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.tar.gz
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   833B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   164B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.tar.gz.sha512
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff    11M Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.zip
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   833B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.zip.asc
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   161B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-bin.zip.sha512
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   2.7M Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.tar.gz
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   833B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.tar.gz.asc
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   164B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   4.0M Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.zip
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   833B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.zip.asc
>>> -rw-r--r--@  1 rz  staff   161B Dec  5 06:57
>>> apache-opennlp-2.5.6.1-src.zip.sha512
>>> 
>>> in opennlp-distr; so actually:
>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/opennlp/opennlp-2.5.6.1/
>>> 
>>> The thing is, that we didn’t notice that in the release vote (maybe we
>>> should discuss some sort of formal checklist like it is done in the
>>> incubator to avoid missing such things??)
>>> 
>>> Since we had some fixes and updates on the 2.x brach, I am proposing to do
>>> 2.5.7 and volunteer as release manager.
>>> 
>>> If no one objects, I am going to create a first RC over the weekend.
>>> 
>>> Gruß
>>> Richard
> 

Reply via email to