a. +1
b. Prefer b1 but I'm not tied to it.
c. I'm not aware of any ASF requirements. I think sending it to dev@
and on the website should be sufficient.

Thanks,
Jeff

On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:51 PM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> a) +1
> b) b2/b3 (if other CVEs are approaching)
>
> Examples: https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0.x-eos.html
>
> > Am 18.06.2026 um 05:23 schrieb Martin Wiesner <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > given recent security fixes that landed in OpenNLP's main branch and the 
> > request for back porting these changes to the very oldskoolish 1.9.x line 
> > [1], the people involved noticed that the efforts to maintain three 
> > separate version lines along the road were pretty high and resource 
> > consuming.
> >
> > Therefore, I'd like to propose to (finally) declare Apache OpenNLP 1.9.x 
> > EOL publicly via a News announcement on the project's website.
> >
> > Primary questions:
> > (a) Do we have consensus that such an EOL announcement is long overdue and 
> > should be put out rather soonish?
> > (b) Time of the announcement: Options that I see:
> > - b1: Directly with the projected release of the 1.9.5, marking it as the 
> > last release ever to be expected for OpenNLP 1.x.
> > - b2: Shortly after - with a grace period - for instance End of July 2026, 
> > or similar short ranged targets.
> > - b3: End of year 2026, that is Dec 31, 2026
> > (c) Are there any requirements by the ASF to put out an EOL announcement? 
> > Jeff, do you have infos about it?
> >
> > Open for others to add thoughts and related aspects to this discussion.
> > Please share your opinions and provide (your) answers to question (a) to 
> > (c).
> >
> > Best
> > Martin | mawiesne
> > --
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/nvzl4g2b6rc149nf54xpnorjso5h0mlp

Reply via email to