+1

Thanks, Richard. Looks good.

Thanks,
Jeff

On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 7:32 AM Richard Zowalla via dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - signatures and SHA-512 ok (KEYS from dist/release)
> - src archives match the tag a6dc9afed (minus git dotfiles)
> - LICENSE/NOTICE ok, no unexpected binaries, RAT passes
> - built from the src archive with JDK 21 incl. tests: ok
> - bin CLI test ok
>
> Minor, not blocking: the morfologik section in the bin LICENSE still has
> "Copyright (c) <YEAR> <OWNER>". (same as 3.0.0)
>
> Richard
>
> On 2026/11/12 10:07:36 Richard Zowalla via dev wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to call a vote for the release of Apache OpenNLP 2.5.13, a 
> > maintenance release of the 2.x line.
> >
> > The release candidate is available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opennlp/opennlp-2.5.13-rc1/
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1076/
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is opennlp-2.5.13 (commit 
> > a6dc9afed462fa556c5751dbcf337993c3fd89ab):
> > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-2.5.13
> >
> > The release artifacts are signed with the key E5B8A431, which is listed in:
> > https://downloads.apache.org/opennlp/KEYS
> >
> > Release notes:
> > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/releases/tag/untagged-141cbc35899869ba1d03
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311215&version=12357511
> > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/compare/opennlp-2.5.12...opennlp-2.5.13
> >
> > Eval build for the tag:
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/job/eval-tests-releases/41/
> >
> > Please check, for example:
> > - signatures and SHA-512 checksums of the artifacts
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE files
> > - ASF license headers in the source files
> > - the build from the source archive (Java 17 or later)
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes with at least three 
> > binding +1 votes and more +1 than -1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release Apache OpenNLP 2.5.13
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> >
> >

Reply via email to