Messages by Thread
-
Re: (openoffice) branch trunk updated: AOO5 logos
Don Lewis
-
boost 1.84.0 source archive on Sourceforge missing
Don Lewis
-
Support Help
Dawn Williams via dev
-
introabout images
Don Lewis
-
[PR] Enable GCC and Clang address sanitizer [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Feature Request - for OpenOffice DRAW
Perry Wood
-
MacOS signing update and fix the blue button + black text
Petko
-
AOO42X testtools build failure on FreeBSD x86
Don Lewis
-
EPM 5.1.0
Jim Jagielski
-
[PR] Minor GTK2 code cleanup [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
New Pdf importer in construction
Petko
-
HSQLDB to version 2.7.4
Petko
-
Re: A couple of bugs in your program
Petko
-
[PR] java: replace obsolete dependencies on xml-apis and Xerces. [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Anyone working on the gcc-freebsd-aarch64 CPP bridge ?
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
MacOS Silicon build from trunk
Petko
-
Raising the Java version to 11
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
Call for Volunteers - AOO 4.1.17
Jim Jagielski
-
blog post on the development plans
Petko
-
[PR] Remove StAX from the build. [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] solver: Initial/current Calc solution [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
next testbuild AOO about saving files.
Petko
-
[PR] Win10 msvc trunk [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] Fix non-system build of Python 3 on Linux [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
[PR] calc/solver: Update error reporting for CoinMP [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
compile trunk with modern windows build tools
Petko
-
Jim OOO Aug 21-29
Jim Jagielski
-
1st build with 2019 compiler
Petko
-
ICU 4.8.1 in IBM's Symphony
Pedro F. Giffuni via dev
-
[PR] Report wizard start failures instead of failing silently (bz-80338) [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
Release targets for AOO
Petko
-
Ineed to take a break
Matthias Seidel
-
license for graphics?
Matthias Seidel
-
my absence
Matthias Seidel
-
[PR] Update Capitalise.py [openoffice]
via GitHub
-
issues with heritage and modern compilers
Petko
-
[DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Dave Fisher
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Petko
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Pedro Lino via dev
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?
Pedro Lino via dev
-
[DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X
Arrigo Marchiori
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X
Marcus
-
Trunk is AOO 5.1.x, and welcome to new branch AOO50X
Jim Jagielski
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Drop AOO42X (Was: Re: [DISCUSSION] AOO, the next version after 4.1.x. What to name?_
Petko