On 15 November 2012 22:16, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 to move. > > > > But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a > file/directory > > in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if I do a > > checkout of an old version it is included ?? > > > > If you check out a tree you get the contents of that tree at that > specific revision. By default you get the most-recent revision, the > "head". But you can specify a specific earlier revision as needed. > This will also resurrect deleted files that existed in that revision. > > There are some administrative things an admin could do with svnadmin > dump and svndumpfilter to truly expunge a file, for legal or other > extreme reasons. But this is very rare. > > > If I am correct, why do we keep these things in trunk ? > > > > Not so much that anyone decided to keep it, but that no one decided to > clean it up. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, etc.
Not I know why I never passed that exam as engineer....I think you once wrote to me JFDI, it is quite confusing when you try to get into the code, and there seems to be more examples like "binfilter". > > Regards, > > -Rob > > > > rgds > > jan I. > > > > > > On 15 November 2012 21:57, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:09 PM, jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Apart from the branches it seems we have a directory called > "trunk-orig", > >> > that only seems to contain 3 files, are they important ?? > >> > > >> > +1 to remove branches when they are integrated, it gives a lot better > >> > overview. > >> > > >> > >> These were some scripts we used during the original import of the > >> OpenOffice.org codebase. Not needed anymore, but if we want them for > >> future reference they might be better under /devtools, maybe directly > >> into /devtools/hg2svn (Was mainly concerned with migration from > >> Mercurial to SVN). > >> > >> If there are no objections I'll do such a move. > >> > >> -Rob > >> > >> > >> > Jan. > >> > > >> > On 15 November 2012 13:19, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Rist <andrew.r...@oracle.com > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > On 11/14/2012 3:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make > sense > >> >> >> to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what > each > >> >> >> one is, and who is maintaining it? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Current branches are: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need a 3.4.2 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> alg/ -- This is Armin's long-term graphics rendering improvement > >> work, > >> >> >> maybe integrated for AOO 4.1 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> gbuild/ -- This looks new, from Andrew. Sounds build-related. > But > >> >> >> what is it? And what is the plan for getting it integrated? Is > this > >> >> >> planned AOO 4.0? > >> >> > > >> >> > This is a continuation of this: > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201209.mbox/%3c505a1dc4.5030...@oracle.com%3E > >> >> > > >> >> > integration of a set of CWSes: > >> >> > ause131 > >> >> > ause130 > >> >> > writerfilter10 > >> >> > gnumake4 > >> >> > sd2gbuild > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> And integration? Is this targeted for AOO 4.0? If so it would be > >> >> good to get it reflected in this table: > >> >> > >> >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planning > >> >> > >> >> That helps with the QA planning. The more we know about what is > going > >> >> into 4.0, the more we can start thinking about how we will test it, > >> >> maybe even start writing the test cases for new features, if the > >> >> design is clear enough now. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks! > >> >> > >> >> -Rob > >> >> > >> >> > The initial branch for doing this work was deleted and this new > branch > >> >> > created. With the original branch, I had applied all of the > patches > >> en > >> >> > masse, followed by one massive check-in. We'll just say that this > was > >> >> > sub-optimal. After discussions at ApacheConEU - it was decided the > >> best > >> >> > course was to start from scratch, that way we don't have to merge > up > >> to > >> >> the > >> >> > latest trunk. I'm in the process now of applying and committing > all > >> the > >> >> > patches, followed by changing all the headers in newly created > files. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > fun > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > A. > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> writer001/ -- Ditto. What is it and what is the plan for getting > it > >> >> >> integrated? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -Rob > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >
