On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 01/14/2013 02:35 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pesce...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Rob Weir wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I could see /platforms/mac if we imagine creating in the future >>>> similar landing pages for Windows or Linux. >>>> Note that today, a query of "OpenOffice for Linux" has this ancient >>>> page as a #1 hit: >>>> http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/setup-linux.html >>>> And the #1 hit for "OpenOffice for Windows" is not even at our >>>> website. It goes to CNet's download.com page. >>> >>> >>> >>> Very interesting. Indeed this could also be the way to catch users who >>> look >>> for "OpenOffice Portable", for example, and should know that we do have a >>> (third-party, from winPenPack) version available; they are now offered an >>> ancient version since OpenOffice Portable has not been updated yet. The >>> updated version is not on the first page of search results. >>> >> >> Exactly. >> >> In the last month we've seen the following related queries: >> >> openoffice portable 2,500 >> open office portable 1,000 >> openoffice portable italiano 150 >> apache openoffice portable 16 >> portable 90 >> openoffice portable download 16 >> portable openoffice 12 >> openofficeportable <10 >> office portable <10 >> openoffice portable日本語版 <10 >> openoffice portable 3.4 <10 >> openoffice 3.4 portable <10 >> openoffice portable deutsch <10 >> openoffice.org portable 日本語版 <10 >> portable open office <10 >> openoffice.org portable <10 >> openoffice portable 日本語 <10 >> >> For many of these queries the #1 page is the German page: >> http://www.openoffice.org/de/downloads/oooportable.html. That is not >> the optimal page for most of these queries. > > > Maybe a good chance to add a "/products/portable" area like Rob suggestes in > a later mail and attempted already with "/products/windows". >
We sort of have that indirectly since the /products pages would have a leftnav link point to /porting and /porting already links to the winPenPack distribution. I suppose it depends on whether we want to make a distinction between the binaries that we sign and release, which we know comes from our release source code, versus downstream versions which might vary. -Rob > Marcus >
