On 27 March 2013 15:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you pointed > > out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly your problem now? > > I don't have any problem at all. > > > I don't think that it will help us if we react this way. > > I am not reacting. Please don't turn this into a circus like the one > with the 0^0. > > > Really nobody wanted that you revert anything here. > > I am no native English speaker, but for the content, and the tone, of > Andre mails, I understood he wanted his extension back: > For the record, you are not the only one who understood that it should be reverted. I think we need to a bit more careful on this list, not to demotivate people doing a fine job. rgds Jan I. > > > I don't see why this change should be a good thing. > > > I was hoping that I would find the time in the future to fix this > > > Including the pre-bundled extensions into the core is a workaround not > > a fix. > > > We are still able (well until your changes) to release the presenter > > console under Apache license > > > I still don' t see the benefit of the change. > > > [...] This is something that I have used several times in the past and > > always was very glad that I had it. > > And he got it back (together with the Presentation Minimizer, as it > makes no sense to have one pre-registered extension and the other > integrated). > > Again, I don't have any problem at all, nor then, nor now :) > > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina >
