> On 10 Dec2014, at 15:01, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> There are other issues, too, like licensing, metrics, and general community >> governance. > > Note that FOSDEM talks have a requirement to be technical. We had to reject a > interesting submission about community metrics in the past since FOSDEM is > not the place for it. > > I can look up details if you wish, but this is one of the few constraints > that FOSDEM places on track content and it is the reason for > https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_talks_open_document > to explicitly ask for "technical talks”.
Right; but at the same time, there are other options besides talks; and, besides, there are groups on licensing and metrics, as I mentioned, going. The community metrics is related to Bitergia. Licensing is related to CC and others. (FWIW, I’ve participated at several Fosdems. I know the score and also that its an evolving quantity.) … and just saw that Simon echoed my point re Bitergia. Good idea, btw, to look at what is already accepted rather than accept defeat before any venture, no? Louis > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
