Hi all -- On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote:
> Hi Peter, > > Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > Okay I had a look now. > > > > I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag. > > > > I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 reports. > > > > Are these all of them? > > I don't know your list, can you post the issue numbers? > Or just the filter string? > > > > > > > - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have to > > note the issue number. :( > > > > > > Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone wants > > still to add from the dev list? > > I have a lot of them, but they do not qualify as blocker. > But I know that Andrea wanted to ask for a blocker, but we hadn't > enabled the flag at that time. > > Regards, > Matthias > I had been constructing release blocker queries for some of the other releases. I just put together a query for the release block requests for 4.1.6 -- https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=236879&namedcmd=4.1.6_blocker_requested&remaction=run (I didn't do this for 4.1.5 but for many of the previous releases.) Hopefully this will work once you are logged in to https://bz.apache.org/ooo AND hopefully the same ones Peter has referenced. Of course someone can always modify the query. HTH. > > > > All the best > > > > Peter > > > > On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > >> I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want to > >> add one patch concerning mailmerge. > >> And then off we go, I Think. > >> > >> > >> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x > >> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one else > >> is moving to 4.2.0. > >> > >> > >> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski > >> <j...@jagunet.com>: > >>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on > >>> whether it really is one or not ;) > >>> > >>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds! > >>> > >>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel > >>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > >>>> Hi Jim, > >>>> > >>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >>>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that they > >>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for > >>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make > >>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and > >>> fixes, as feasible for those users. > >>>> Definitely! > >>>> We already have some release blocker asked for. > >>>> > >>>> How to proceed? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Matthias > >>>> > >>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel > >>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi Andrea, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: > >>>>>>>> How about this one: > >>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 > >>>>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process. > >>>>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a > >>>>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it > >>> wouldn't > >>>>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk > >>> and > >>>>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I > >>> understand > >>>>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In general, release blockers should be: > >>>>>>> - important bugfixes for users > >>>>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) > >>>>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a > >>> newer > >>>>>>> Windows release... just an example) > >>>>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would > >>> finally > >>>>>> find its way into a release. > >>>>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Matthias > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Andrea. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."
