Hi Andrea, Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> How about this one: >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >> It fixes a typo in the build process. > > This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a > maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't > make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and > (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand > if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
My idea would be to create another flag in Bugzilla for patches that do not qualify as "blocker" but would be "nice to have"... Regards, Matthias > > In general, release blockers should be: > - important bugfixes for users > - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) > - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer > Windows release... just an example) > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
