Hi Andrea Thank you for the links. FontAwesome requires a paid license to have access to the SVGs so I guess that excludes it. Personally I would avoid using something from Google so my choice would be Remixicon. But I think we need to check which one has the most complete set. Maybe we need a combination of both themes.
Grazie mille! Pedro > On 05/30/2021 8:51 AM Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Pedro Lino wrote: > >>> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> https://remixicon.com/ > >> > >> This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other > >> projects that you have found? > > > > FontAwesome https://fontawesome.com/license/free is really popular and > > CC-BY (but recent versions include a "Pro" section that may have > > different terms). > > > > Google's Material Design Icons ... are > > AL2, come in different styles and, although the set is already quite > > comprehensive, are extended by community projects. > > I copy-pasted the same link twice... the correct link to Google's > Material Design Icons is https://fonts.google.com/icons > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
