--- Jens-Heiner Rechtien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Well to me it looks like your checkout is broken > because you definitely missing at least two required > modules. You can check them out by name, for example > "cvs -d ... co epm". It's no wonder your build broke > ...
Ok, that's the explanation. That and why I disabled I already explained - truly my fault. What makes the unodevtools directory missing I don't know. > BTW ... you did check out? Or did you download the > source tarball and the modules are missing in the > source tarball? 2.0.1 source tarball. It's an directory unotools there, but no unodevtools. I just started another try to compile that tarball and for this adventure I additionally checked out unodevtools via CVS. May it help. > Epm creates the rpm-archives, that's the regular way > to obtain installation sets. Ok, but the point I don't get (and you seem to miss seeing) is *why* do I need an installation set. That's ok if I just want compile and use OOo, but do all you developers constantly tweak the source, compile *and then* build installation sets, install OOo and see if your tweak worked? Doesn't OOo run from the compilation target directory? > There used to be a way to just create tar-balls, > don't know if it still works. It should, but it might > be not that often used and thus subject to bit rot. Oh, nice. If it works I'm looking forward getting rpm's my system (FreeBSD as mentioned) can't handle (by default). > Won't work every time :-) Sure, I'll not rely on that. > http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/ Thanks, they're there (someone should update the docs). But, as expected not, for my "exotic" system. Johannes ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
