Hi Rene,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
(Not to mention you renamed the packages so that they are not parallel
installable anymore with the official debs, but that's another matter)
This is unfortunate. But, we can not really know and check all distros
package names.
yes, but there's only one Debian and you could have looked. In any case, I
raised my voice hours after I saw that on the CVS list so there would be a
chance to revert that (the wasn't something bad about openofficeorg-*
instead of openoffice.org-*).
But I agree it's only unfortunate...
I still don't see the problem here: who - beside package maintainers -
would want to install _released_ vanilla OOo beside debian OOo on a
single system ? How many users actually complained about this ?
For milestone builds, ooo-dev is used for package names. And I thought
we worked out a way to avoid incompatible mixtures of the two package
sources.
What I agree with being unfortunate is that we started with
"openofficeorg" initially. We somehow expected the '.' to cause
problems, but the ure package proved the opposite.
Regards,
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
