The wonderful thing about version control is the ability to undo changes if they seem to be a bad idea down the road.
-- Michael Leibowitz Software Engineer, Channel Platform Solutions Group Intel Corporation michael.leibowitz at intel.com +1 503 264 7621 >-----Original Message----- >From: Mathias Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:24 AM >To: dev@openoffice.org >Subject: Re: [dev] configmgr re-factor ... > >Hi Michael, > >sorry for being late, but I want to add a question to the "shared >memory" topic. > >Michael Meeks wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I'm starting an 'interesting' step-wise re-factor of configmgr - >> stripping out tons of complexity. It seems to be going well so far ;-) >> [ removed the 'simpleheap' thing without too much difficulty ], but I'm >> wondering: >> >> Is it ok up-stream to strip out all these poorly performing >> side-effects of the (unused) shared-memory architecture ? :-) > >I don't remember what the proposed use cases for this architecture were. >Maybe it's something that could be useful if we decided to use separate >processes for each application? There are no plans to do so ATM but you >never know... > >Best regards, >Mathias > >-- >Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead >Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
