On 5/15/07, Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi PA,
Hi Eike,
On Monday, 2007-05-14 14:29:36 +0200, PA Galmes wrote: > In fact, i7211 is a duplicate of i71990 but not of i3884. > > Could someone explain why different issues are marked as dups? Possibly because the person marking i7211 as dupe of i3884 didn't notice the difference between linked and embedded files. In fact they are different issues, and i71990 is a dupe of i7211. Feel free to rearrange.
I don't have the rights to, but I suppose "someone" (maybe KPalagin) could do it.
P.S.: As you're not subscribed to the mailing list you were posting to, you will miss replies that are directed to the list only. When answering, please reply only to the list (Reply-To header is set), not to my personal account. Thanks.
Oh, thanks. As I use a multi-adress account, I had not set things properly. Thanks for showing it to me. -- Pierre-André Galmes Free Software consultant StarXpert - www.starxpert.fr 6, rue Eugène Varlin - 75010 Paris
