Hi all, Christoph Neumann wrote:
> Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: >> Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> Malte Timmermann wrote: >>>> My point of view: >>>> >>>> Most people agree that OOo mustn't loose (meta) data when Java is not >>>> available, but plug ins for working with meta data can rely on Java. >>>> >>>> Changing OOo's Java base line from 1.4 to 1.5 is fine for most people >>>> then. >>> >>> AFAIK the current Java baseline is 1.3.1. >> That is correct, the (still) valid consensus regarding Java can be found >> here: >> >> http://tools.openoffice.org/policies/java_usage.html >> >> respectively the background: >> >> http://tools.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=jdk&msgNo=90 > > This document is aged four. Shouldn't we reconsider about this status? I think what we need is a list of complete and 100% free Java implementations on all relevant platforms and the Java version they are compatible to. Do we have one? Or do we have a volunteer creating one? Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
