On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 17:14 +0900, Hung Nguyen Vu wrote: > Sorry for cross-posting but I seems that I have asked in a wrong mailing > list. > So I forward this email. >
> When I compile DEV300_m29 with dmake, I get the following *warning*: > > /home/vuhung/public_html/foss/src/DEV300_m29/solver/300/ > unxlngi6.pro/inc/com/sun/star/uno/Any.hxx:268: > warning: lowering visibility of 'sal_Bool > com::sun::star::uno::operator==(const com::sun::star::uno::Any&, const > C&) [with C = bool]' to match its type > > Is that safe to ignore the warning? Basically "yes", it is safe to ignore the warning. What is your compiler version, i.e. gcc -v. Some various vendors gcc versions between about > 4.1.X and < 4.3.0 had various slightly different experimental visibility features in them. One of them was sort of an attempt (IIUC) to make visibility markup a sort of C++ language extension and so giving these sort of warnings when (what was felt to be) logical inconsistencies in markup was detected Now in gcc 4.3.0 things have settled down visibility-wise and such a compiler shouldn't warn about this. *some* gcc variant's visibility stuff doesn't always work right, and can cause horrific hard-to-find crashes. But I think that if your compiler gets past the configure tests for common visibility brokenness then you should be safe regardless of those warnings. C. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
