On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 15:57 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > or, if it is intentional, introduce some white-space to silence gcc, > e.g. from > > for (int nCount = 0; nCount++ != nIndex; ++nCount, ++p); > to > for (int nCount = 0; nCount++ != nIndex; ++nCount, ++p) ; > > FWIW, I've filed individual bugs for all the loops that are probably > wrong. >
This is still bad taste. Either put the ; on a new line to clearly mark it, or put an empty pair of curly braces. I always favor the later as I'm of the policy that curly brace are not optional. But that's just me. Hub --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
