On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:47 +0200, Bernd Eilers wrote: > Caolán McNamara wrote: > Now, well does it make sense to activate such feature on any CWS at all? > I would say not much as the whole idea here is to get end-user usage > patterns not usage-pattern from usages of developers or testers which > might differ significantly.
Fair enough. I was labouring under the misunderstanding (because I ran the test-tooling from automation and was getting a "missing oooimprovement" error and then recalled some comment in a previous workspace that underwent qa-ing that various tests had to be skipped/ignored due to its absence) that oooimprovement included some tooling that supported extended generic qa testing. Clearly that's not the case, and the error/warning refers basically solely to a qa test for the correct functioning of the oooimprovement stuff itself, and not that it cannot be property qa-ed. C. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
