Questions Is /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 needed? Can I simply remove or rename it?
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
libgcc_s.so.1 comes with GCC, is part of its runtime libraries, and evolves backwards-compatibly over time. OOo includes the libgcc_s.so.1 matching the GCC with which it is built. On any given Linux machine, a newer libgcc_s.so.1 may be installed in the system, and any given dynamic library that OOo happens to load from the system may require it.
I see.
The only good solution, indeed, is to remove the old OOo version of libgcc_s.so.1 so that all pick up the new version from the system.
Good. So, one of the following files could be removed in case of CentOS 5.2. - /opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 embedded in the OpenOffice.org 3.1.1 is for gcc 3.4.x used by the release engineers. - /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 accompanied by CentOS 5.2 seems for gcc 4.2.x.
Whether and, if yes, how that relates to your JVM problem I do not know, though (java.lang.ProcessBuilder was introduced in Java 5---maybe that gives a clue).
Thanks a lot, Tora --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
