On 01/05/10 16:40, Fabio A. Miranda wrote:
Good day/yr:
Anyone know what's wrong with unopkg in Ubuntu 64 (karmic):
fa...@catullus:~$ /opt/openoffice.org3/program/unopkg
gui /tmp/UniOffice//UniOffice.oxt
ERROR:
[/home/fabio/.openoffice.org/3/user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registered_packages.db]
Berkeley Db error (0): Db::open: Invalid argument
unopkg failed.
fa...@catullus:~$ /opt/openoffice.org3/program/unopkg
gui /tmp/UniOffice/UniOffice.oxt
ERROR:
[/home/fabio/.openoffice.org/3/user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registered_packages.db]
Berkeley Db error (0): Db::open: Invalid argument
unopkg failed.
fa...@catullus:~$ /opt/openoffice.org3/program/unopkg
gui /tmp/UniOffice/OOOP-accessories-2.6.0.2.oxt
ERROR:
[/home/fabio/.openoffice.org/3/user/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registered_packages.db]
Berkeley Db error (0): Db::open: Invalid argument
unopkg failed.
fa...@catullus:~$ file /opt/openoffice.org3/program/unopkg
/opt/openoffice.org3/program/unopkg: POSIX shell script text executable
OOo can be configured (at build time) to use its specific, checked-in
version of BerkeleyDB or the one provided by the system OOo is run on.
AFAIK, different versions of BerkeleyDB use incompatible file formats.
Maybe you shared your /home/fabio/.openoffice.org/3 user installation
across different OOo instances that use different BerkeyleyDB versions.
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
