Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:36:16AM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC > was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org > community and against derivated work. And in consequence of this i see
a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the "community". which you don't. there's still many sun-internal decision just posed to the "community" as a fact everyxone has to live with. There's still bugs not fixed or cared about because it doesn't affect *you* (but only people outside) Or patches lingering around for no reason because no one cares about. > a conflict with somebody in the CC who is nowadays the driving force > behind a spin-off (wording of go-oo, i call it fork others derivated > work). It might be not so obvious for many community members what go-oo > really is. And one reason for this is that our project rules are not > accepted as they are. Or only partly. That's not true. At least not for all cases where stuff ends up in go-oo. > be a product development representative for OOo he has to accept the OOo > project rules. says the one who for a long time didn't accept those either. Should I remember you about non-free stuff of yours in the code despite this being a open source (and I do take the official open source definition) project? Grüße/Regards, René --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
