Hi Rene,
Le 15 févr. 11 à 13:19, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eric b wrote:
Sorry, but I tend to disagree : can you please tell me the arm
version choosen by default in OOo source code ? I'm just working at
Whatever default your compiler does.
$ file /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
/usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object,
ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
Yes : armv1 is default
Nothing per default, yes, though. (Debioan armel targets armv4t
anyway,
afaicr)
Indeed : I read that recently when I searched what could be installed
on my BeaglBoard.
the optimization and what I see, tells me it's not optimized at all.
But I can be wrong, and you'll tell me then ...
Even if you were right, how does it matter? OOo also is optimized
"only" for pentiumpro on i386.
And if you wished, you can optimize for whatever ARM you see fit.
What I want to say, is :
- provide OOo for arm version prior to v6 does not really make sense,
because too slow, not enough or embedded ram and so on.
- starting v6, or even v7, is a good compromise
More precisely, starting armv6 version, the efficiency improved a lot.
To provide some figures, doing the test myself, using armv7 flags,
decreased the binary size from 3 to 5% (average value). Now that bad,
when we know OOo size on the disk.
It is obvious, that the current OpenOffice.org can run (I know) on
current ARM, but will be slow as hell on the machine anybody can
buy, today. Nobody will use that, and a lot of work is mandatory.
Wrong. I tried it on my SheevaPlug, and it's "quite" usable.
Is it me, or there is no monitor output ?
The BeagleBoard is not that powerfull, but is hdmi capable. thanks a
lot for the link though.
Regards,
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
