On Dec 22, 2007 12:24 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would be helpful if those with planet experience could share your current > method of processing and analysing planet and the amount of disk and memory > you think is the current minimum.
I don't think there are really any tools that handle a planet dump that *don't* support compressed versions. Certainly, I've not uncompressed a planet dump in quite a while. At least osmosis, osm2pgsql and several others read compressed files just fine. Have noticed that some tools require a lot of memory for temporary storage, though the removal of segments helped a lot. How big is the uncompressed planet dump these days anyway... Something rediculous no doubt... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
