On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Brett Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps I completely misunderstood you. I was worried that you might do > something like this: > 1. way 12345 is currently at version 1. > 2. Via potlatch you edit way 12345 adding a new tag and create version 2. > 3a. Via potlatch you immediately add a second tag and update version 2 to > include the extra tag. > 3b. Via potlatch you immediately add a second tag and create version 3 > including the extra tag. 3b. "In this situation a given changeset will increment the version number of an object more than once." http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6#Version_numbers > I'm happy with whatever label is applied, so long as I understand how it > works :-) Bah, the labelling is the easy bit and potentially the only bit that I'll be any good at :-) > It might make more sense to discuss the changesets implementation. Here are > several ways I could see them being implemented: [...] > > I suspect we're using scheme 3. >From my understanding, that's correct. Individual modifications become ACIDy, but changesets are a loose grouping of changes for labelling, comments and so on. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
