On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:55:43PM +0100, Matthias Rötsch wrote: > > Related to the legal part: I think we should record everything > law-related of the reverse engineering. If it succeeds, it has a high > chance to end up in court. And I don't want to be broke just because the > origin of a certain firmware or map-file cannot be traced back. >
Makes sense to document how findings were done ... > > I'd be interested in bit hacking too - Have the findings been > > documented > > somewhere? Would a seperate list make sense? > A separate list about the TomTom case or about osm related bithacking in > general? When it is about a certain format, an svn-repo or wiki-pages > would be my choice. tomtom format list i'd say - we could use an svn (although i meanwhile prefer git as its a lot faster and imho easier)... Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected] +49-171-2280134 Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
