On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:29:00 +0100, Iván Sánchez Ortega <i...@sanchezortega.es> wrote: >> you're right, maybe we shouldn't have tried to re-use a server-to-server
>> sync format for client-to-server communications, [...] do we really want >> YAOCF (yet another OSM change format) when there are already three? > > The specification of most OSM formats is a wiki page about three pages > long. > The specification of most "professional" GIS formats are 400-page-long > PDFs. That's a good point for NOT using "professional GIS-formats". ;) There's not much of a hope of ever implementing such a spec 100% conforming. Marcus _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
