Simone Cortesi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > >> But could you perhaps check your code and see whether you have an option >> in there that allows the user not only to select agree/disagree but also >> the third option, "agree and PD". And if such an option is not in there, >> could you perhaps ask those who told you to implement the plan whether >> or not this is by design. If they say "yes, we left that out on purpose >> but we don't want anybody to know at this time", then just leave it at >> that and I'll hit them over the head at the next AGM. But if they should >> say "oh, we forgot about that and yes we thing it is a good idea, let's >> have the feature", then just add the feature. > > By the way: does it sound too stupid to wait until next AGM or SOTM to > decide something on the new licence? Is there any real reason to do > this *right now* in hurry? or can we happily wait few months?
You need to address those questions to the Foundation - I don't know anything more than you do as I haven't seen any drafts of the license that you haven't. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
