On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Emilie Laffray <emilie.laff...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > On 25 August 2010 04:33, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Grant Slater >> <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: >> > On 24 August 2010 20:17, Stephan Knauss <o...@stephans-server.de> wrote: >> >> Is it possible to provide a list with userIDs that have agreed to the >> new >> >> terms? >> >> >> > >> > Yes this is planned to be made available shortly. It will be updated >> > on a regular schedule. >> > >> > Last week's LWG minutes also have a nice graphic showing agreed >> contributors: >> > https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_77rbr8fgfw >> >> Yeah the list of user ids would be nice. I'd much rather see a >> picture of what the map will look like than raw number of edits. As >> John has alluded to (though only to a small extent), the graphic above >> is very misleading. >> >> Maybe the DWG could work on a slippy map based solely on the data >> which will be ODbL. It'd give them a way to test the algorithms for >> excluding/including data in addition to providing a visual. >> >> > It is planned. User Ids will be released and we will provide planet to test > the rules that are currently being discussed. Building a rendering could be > something that we could do once we have the data up and running. > Presumably that information was already released to Matt in order for him to make the graphic. Why just to him? What's the delay in making it publically available?
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev