Hi,
I developed my own sql processing to render courtyards, strange multipolygons, 
etc.
Have a look here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/osm2postgresql/
In my view computer code (e.g. sql script) is the only precise tool to define 
what is "a valid polygon with a hole"

Hope this helps,
Mayeul

----- Mail Original -----
De: "Bernhard Zwischenbrugger" <[email protected]>
À: "M∡rtin Koppenhoefer" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected] >> dev" <[email protected]>
Envoyé: Jeudi 19 Mai 2011 00h09:28 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome 
/ Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-dev] courtyards

On 2011-05-09 11:31, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2011/5/9 Bernhard Zwischenbrugger<[email protected]>:
>>> Any links to examples failing to render for you?
>> here for example:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.20651&lon=16.35885&zoom=16&layers=M
>> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.20651&lon=16.35885&zoom=16&layers=M>
>> All the big buildings should have "holes".
>
> IMHO there is "wrong" mapping, as the building-tag is set to the outer
> way instead to the relation. This should work nonetheless (because of
> tolerant rendering, at least it worked for some time in the past), but
> is less "clean"/"unambigous". Try putting the building tag into the
> relation and remove it from the outer way.
>
> The example I looked at was this:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/11132
>
Sorry, I don't understand this.

This building ist rendered correctly:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/58076

and this
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/11151
is not rendered with courtyard.

Where is the difference.

Bernhard


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to