Hi All, I updated the section of the project ideas page relating to this project idea last night. I think it reflects the issues raised in this thread, but please help to clarify if I have missed anything. Main change was stressing that a successful application will need to review existing applications and identify the gap the proposal is filling. Also stress preference for working on existing application over starting another one.
Graham from my phone On 13 Mar 2012 01:17, "Peter Gervai" <grin...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:32, Peter Körner <osm-li...@mazdermind.de> wrote: >> I'm Gihan De Silva a... > The won't be *the* osm application. Depending on what you want to do you'll > need several differe... [...] I am really amused when people want to start yet another application without checking the bunch of already existing ones. I guess I have at least 4-5 apps on my phone handling OSM more or less. Some of them is pretty advanced in the areas they cover. [I personally use OSMand for routing and Locus for everything else, but there are lots of apps really. Starting yet another one and leaving it half finished or unsupported later isn't really helping anyone. Writing "official" code ought to imply YEARS of continuous support... People tend to forget about that.] g _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://li...
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
