Hi Willi. Sorry to read your negative opinion. I think a better and more detailed wiki page helps osm, irrespectively of edit history. I don't see why editing and refining a page is bad. Sure things can always be done better, but the beauty of wikis is that you can update them fast without going through a comitee.
Regards. On Oct 14, 2012 4:39 AM, "Willi" <wil...@gmx.de> wrote: > Imho it's not only bad behavior to change a wiki page 19 times on the same > day it's harming OSM. Having the discussion on the OSM-dev list makes this > even worse. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:multipolygon&action > =history > > All changes except minor should be discussed on the Talk page first. Even > if > you are the expert and are 200% sure that what you are writing is correct > it > might be misleading or even not understandable to non experts. And imho > that's just the case for the new additions. Asking to be involved in > discussions but changing the page without discussion is topping this. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Recent_change_ > about_validity_of_a_multipolygon_relation > > I'm afraid more mapper will turn away from Wiki pages when they neither can > follow nor understand such frequent changes. That's harming OSM. > > Willi > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev