On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Mixing tags from the outer ways and the relation to interpret what > kind of object the relation represents is odd. Things would be much > clearer if tags applying to the relation must go into the relation and > would never be inherited by outer ways. This would be obvious if we > had a "multipolygon-area kind of data type" like Jochen suggests. > > Another thing that's odd is the duality of inner rings: they represent holes, but they can also represent holes AND separate polygons at the same time. Decision on which is which has to be made based on a vague notion of "difference" in tagging. Igor
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
