Hi, On 11/21/2012 11:50 AM, [email protected] wrote:
OK, this seems to be consensual: PBF id 18 in the header block for a signed int UNIX timestamp value.
In both his messages, Scott had suggested PBF id 18 for a signed int epoch value of the file creation, not for a signed int epoch value of the replication state.
It would probably be premature to call this a consensus for a replication state timestamp at PBF id 18.
Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
