Hi Am 23.01.2014 18:28, schrieb Matt Amos: > i encourage everyone to take a look and report back any problems you > find. my thanks to Peter Körner, who seems to already be doing this - > with no problems?
No problems yet. Have run two splits of those files already (http://osm.personalwerk.de/full-history-extracts/) What do you think about adopting the osmium-naming-scheme for history files? .osm.[bz2|gz|pbf] -> regular osm files .osh.[bz2|gz|pbf] -> history files .osc.[bz2|gz]-> changeset-files That would make detecting the kind of file at first glance more easy and it also fits nicely int othe .osc-file nameing convention. I'm going to implement a regular run that generates fresh extracts every week from the available file. Is there any note on which weekday the full-history-dumps are generated, so I can loosely sync my split-script to that rhythm? I xml-writing takes only half as long as xml-reading I'd double-think about supplying xml-based files. nobody really has fun reading such huge files with expat. And if it's really neccessary, there's always osmium_convert which will generate xmls from pbf-dumps or -extracts locally. Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
