On 2014-06-03 12:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 03/giu/2014 um 20:23 schrieb Frederik Ramm <[email protected]>:
I doubt that; I think people are adding place=* to boundary relations
I have also noticed this in various occasions, while this is mostly/often
"wrong" for whole settlements (they tend to have bigger administrative areas
around them than the actually developed space, unless they are in very dense contexts and
the end of one is the beginning of the next), it is often the right thing to do for
settlement parts like quarters.
Didn't dig deeper into the issue about actual percentages of the different
styles, but I know from discussions on the lists that there are at least a few
examples of place areas on their own (this is a field where many mappers will
delete your tag on an area because they'll say that it's duplicating data, and
as the node gets rendered but the area not it is clear to them that the area
must go).
place tags on areas are, putting it kindly, a complete mess right now.
I ran into this with
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/546. It's
absolutely horrible in the US where imports have put place=city on every
incorporated/charted area as well as every CDP, and it frequently gets
added to admin boundaries in non-dense contexts where the administrative
boundary is not coincident with the place.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
