On 11/24/2014 9:29 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
But in a more complex case with more nodes and maybe some other lines involved, we probably want two multipolygons which share a way D-C (and have separate ways D-A-B-C and D-E-F-C, respectively), don't we? But then we have to split up those linestrings.
No - multipolygons which do not consist entirely of closed ways are not generally desirable in the output. I wouldn't mind a switch to do that kind of splitting, which would cover the simple case you outlined too, but it wouldn't be the default.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
