I sent this mail to the list 10 days ago, and hoped the developers would discuss the question of how the code is actually licensed. But there has been no discussion at all, and without a discussion there can be no decision. Would people please look at the issue?
The license for the Javascript code of web site is incompletely specified. The directory contains a copy of GNU GPL version 2, which lists two licensing options for the code. * GPL version 2 or later, which is what we recommend as it is compatible with GPL version 3. * GPL version 2 only. The GPL says that this decision is made and stated with notices in the source files, but these source files have no such notices, meaning no decision was ever stated. Can I ask the developers of those files to make a choice, so that it can be listed in the source files and finish specifying how they are licensed? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
