Thank you for your thoughts. The KML does not have a license defined, but could be declared ODbL because they mapped it themselves. Em 23/10/2015 8:47 PM, "Greg Troxel" <[email protected]> escreveu:
> > Arlindo Pereira <[email protected]> writes: > > > 1) creating a table listing each street on his road list to an array of > OSM > > Way IDs, and somehow indicating to the algorithm that those ways are > > preferred. But this would require constant maintenance as people > > edit/split/merge/erase ways. > > > > 2) considering the street names, and somehow making the routing algorithm > > prefer those ways. > > The basic issue is keeping two databases in somewhat sync. If there is > KML, I would be inclined to have a combining step where the preferred > roads are matched up with OSM data by geometry and then the OSM ways > marked with the special tag (locally). Here, any of id, name, or > shape/location could work. shape/location is probably pretty stable. > > > 3) mapping those characteristics that made he chose those particular > > streets in first place (maxspeed=, incline=, lanes=, highway= itself, etc > > etc) and tuning the routing algorithm to prefer those streets. But > nothing > > would garanteed that the router wouldn't pick a particular tertiary or > even > > highway=residential that is not "calm" in oppositon to a "calm road". > > This would be interesting in the long run, but seems very hard. > > > Is this other dataset also under OdbL and the merged dataset being > released under the same terms? >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
