Nothing strange there. That is the caching. If you load the API URL with the browser and do a shift-reload, you'll see the values change. I just did exactly that.
The expire times were not set well, so it could take a day for the expire to get through. I have now updated them so that the pages should expire shortly after the new data is available. Jochen On Mi, Nov 04, 2015 at 01:08:08 -0700, GerdP wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 01:08:08 -0700 (MST) > From: GerdP <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] taginfo not always as up to date as it says > > Hi Jochen, > > hmm, strange. It seems that the api has different values compared to the > webpage. > I use a command like this: > curl -o nodes-%date%.txt > "http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/api/4/key/values?key=highway&sortname=value&sortorder=asc&format=json_pretty&filter=nodes"; > to produce a file and the content of this file doesn't match the data in the > webpage. > I just repeated the command and the file still contains > total": 251, > while the webpage > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway?filter=nodes#values > shows 239 entries. > > Gerd > > > Jochen123 wrote > > All logs show that the update worked fine. I don't have the numbers from > > yesterday, so I can't compare. Please tell me exactly what you did, which > > URLs you asked for with which software, etc? Did you start with a clean > > cache (Use shift-reload on Firefox)? > > > > Jochen > > > > On Di, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:58:03 -0700, GerdP wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 23:58:03 -0700 (MST) > >> From: GerdP < > > > gpetermann_muenchen@ > > > > > >> To: > > > dev@ > > >> Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] taginfo not always as up to date as it says > >> > >> Seems to happen again today. The date on the web page > >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ > >> recently changed to "Data from: 2015-11-03 23:58 UTC", > >> but all counters are the same as the day before. > >> (not only for the key highway, also surface, oneway,natural) > >> > >> Gerd > >> > >> > >> Jochen123 wrote > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:14:27AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > >> >> I just noted that taginfo > >> >> > >> >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> claims to show data from 2015-10-21 23:58 UTC > >> >> > >> >> This looks wrong, as the numbers for highways are exactly the same as > >> the > >> >> day before > >> >> > >> >> when it showed > >> >> > >> >> 2015-10-20 23:58 UTC > >> > > >> > Probably a caching issue. Try again with clean browser cache. > >> > > >> > Jochen > >> > -- > >> > Jochen Topf > >> > >> > jochen@ > >> > >> > http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > dev mailing list > >> > >> > dev@ > >> > >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/taginfo-not-always-as-up-to-date-as-it-says-tp5857586p5858867.html > >> Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dev mailing list > >> > > > dev@ > > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > > -- > > Jochen Topf > > > jochen@ > > > http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > > dev@ > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/taginfo-not-always-as-up-to-date-as-it-says-tp5857586p5858875.html > Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev -- Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-351-31778688 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
