Mateusz Konieczny-2 wrote > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 03:24:25 -0700 (MST) > Gerd Petermann <
> gpetermann_muenchen@ > > wrote: > >> OK, thanks for the quick feedback. The term "technically not possible" >> seems to mean that I cannot help to fix it ? > > Anybody can help, but it requires some additional knowledge. For start > "There's nothing published about moving a style to hstore and making > schema choices based on data." (quoting > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1975 ). > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@ > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev Well, I have nearly no knowledge regarding the underlying database system (DB) PostgreSQL, but I am eager to find out why the rendering of accepted attributes require changes in the system architecture. My understanding so far: - ford=yes is only one of many attributes which are well documented but not rendered. - Whatever DB design is used now is considered to be unable to store more attributes without changing the DB design. - it was decided that the new design has to use hstore - nobody has made progress understanding how hstore works since then. Maybe it is time to go back one step and ask if hstore is the only possible solution? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Why-is-ford-yes-not-rendered-in-the-default-style-tp5861038p5861104.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
